InitiativesPros and Cons of Web 2.0 TechnologiesBy Renee Oricchio
For most CIOs, the Web 2.0 technologies spreading like wildfire through large organizations are simply headaches. Compared to traditional technology solutions, Web 2.0 technologies are unstable, less mature and more difficult to integrate. These technologies also tend to compromise security and present a potential nightmare for compliance. "CIOs are not particularly pleased," says G. Oliver Young, an analyst from Forrester Research. "From their point of view, [Web 2.0] wrestles control out of their hands and into the hands of users." Web 2.0 refers to a variety of social networking technologies that have been lumped together under one heading. The term was coined in 2004 when some industry leaders started to recognize the Web as a platform that supports a myriad of increasingly popular social networking tools. Web 2.0 now includes blogs, wikis, RSS feeds, and other similar technologies that have been adapted to the workplace to allow employees to interact while they may be physically located thousands of miles away -- or even in a neighboring building. In fact, in a recent survey conducted by Clearswift, a Redwood City, Calif., content security company, 87% of U.S. workers said that they access a Web 2.0 site at least once a week, while 63% visit at least once daily. The most popular applications include:
Enterprise applications for Web 2.0 "That was actually the finding that surprised me the most," says Rachael Happe, a research manager from IDC, referring to a recent survey she authored. "A lot of these applications really shine in a complex, opaque environment typical of a larger organization." While conventional wisdom might suggest Web 2.0 would be a more obvious choice for the smaller organization (they are typically cheap, if not free, and easy to adopt at the user level), Happe believes social networking tools are a great complement to more traditional solutions. They make it easier for large numbers of team members to work across departmental lines and geographic distances. Workers in that same study indicated that they actually use these so-called "social networking tools" less for socializing and more for work purposes. So how are they being used? Young says that, in the business environment, Web 2.0 tools basically fall into two categories:
Despite the headaches, CIOs still adopt Web 2.0 The reasons for not adopting are equally interesting. Nearly half of the CIOs surveyed who haven't rolled out 2.0 tools say it's because they just don't see the need yet. In the survey, 35% say they have more important problems to solve. Another interesting nugget from that same survey shows IT decision makers would be more willing to adopt Web 2.0 tools if they were bundled into a suite. Some very familiar big names don't need to be told twice. An assortment of Web 2.0 suites are either heading for market or were recently launched from such companies as SAP, Oracle, IBM, Intel and Cisco. The launch of new products confirms some of the findings in the survey of CIOs by Forrester. While many CIOs are not exactly embracing these technologies, only 4% believe that Web 2.0 is a passing fad. Renee Oricchio is a freelance writer in Norwalk, Conn. For the past 20 years, she has been writing and producing news segments about technology and business for CNN, MSNBC, Ziff-Davis, CNet and a variety of Silicon Valley-based local news outlets. |
ADVERTISEMENT Related ContentFast Fact
"Workers are going to use these tools, period. It's a losing game to prevent it." --G. Oliver Young, Analyst, Forrester Research Podcast Audio ContentCIO Strategy Center is now available in audio format. This week's feature topic is: Risks of Wireless EmailPlaytime: 8 min 23 sec |